Kundra, whereas submitting the bail plea earlier than the court docket, had claimed that there was no proof towards him in the supplementary cost sheet filed by the Crime Branch of Mumbai Police in the case. Raj Kundra had filed a bail utility in the court docket on 18 September. He had filed a bail utility by way of his lawyer Prashant Patil, which was heard on Monday and his bail was granted.
In this petition, he had mentioned that he was being made a scapegoat. In the petition filed, Raj had mentioned that there was no proof in the supplementary cost sheet filed in the case to instantly set up his involvement in the making of the alleged objectionable movie.
In reality, in this case, the Crime Branch staff had just lately filed a supplementary cost sheet towards Raj Kundra and three others for making obscene (porn) movies and making them on air with the assist of some apps. It was solely after this that Raj Kundra moved the Metropolitan Court and argued that the matter has been virtually investigated.
In the petition filed on behalf of Raj, it was mentioned that in the first place, no content material proves any offense towards him. It was additionally talked about in the utility that Raj Kundra was wrongly implicated in the case though his title was not talked about in the FIR and the police has forcibly dragged his title in the case.
Raj Kundra released from jail