Pornography Case: Raj Kundra seeks bail claiming lack of evidence, says he is being made a ‘scapegoat’

Businessman Raj Kundra, accused within the porn movie case, on Saturday filed a bail software within the court docket, claiming that he is being made a ‘scapegoat’. It additionally mentioned that there is no proof within the supplementary cost sheet filed within the case to show his direct involvement in making the alleged objectionable movie.

The Crime Branch, which is probing the case, has lately filed a supplementary cost sheet in opposition to Raj Kundra and three others for allegedly making porn movies and broadcasting them with the assistance of sure apps. Thereafter the accused moved the Metropolitan Court and argued that the matter has been virtually investigated.

Raj Kundra Porn Case: Shilpa Shetty’s assertion – neither requested her husband nor did he ever inform something
Raj Kundra, husband of Bollywood actress Shilpa Shetty, was arrested on July 19. A case has been registered in opposition to them below varied sections of the Indian Penal Code and Information Technology Act. Presently Raj Kundra is in judicial custody. In the bail software filed via advocate Prashant Patil, Raj Kundra claimed that until date the prosecution doesn’t have a single proof to hyperlink the ‘Hotshots’ app with the offense on the premise of regulation.

According to the prosecution, the accused used to add and stream pornographic materials via the Hotshots app. The bail software additionally said that in your entire supplementary cost sheet there is not a single allegation in opposition to the current applicant (Raj Kundra) to point that he was actively concerned within the taking pictures of any video. Rather it is on the discretion of the artist whether or not to add the content material to the App or not.

1467-page chargesheet in opposition to Raj Kundra, businessman in jail for 58 days for making porn movie
The software mentioned that the contents of the grievance prima facie don’t disclose any offense in opposition to Kundra. The software claimed that Raj Kundra was wrongly implicated within the case. His identify was not there within the FIR however the respondent (police) forcibly dragged his identify within the case.

The petition mentioned that the rationale for this could solely be given by the company however they’re being made a ‘scapegoat’. It mentioned that the investigation clearly reveals that Raj Kundra is not remotely concerned in any offense of making “objectionable material”. The court docket will hear Raj Kundra’s bail software on Monday.

Raj Kundra

Raj Kundra

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top