A bench of Justice SS Shinde and Justice NJ Jamadar refused to entertain the intervention petition saying that if the courtroom permits an intervention petition for that reason, then such petitions will lead to a line within the courtroom. The courtroom stated, ‘We won’t hear you right now. You haven’t got viewers rights right now. If we enable this utility what about a whole lot of others? The courtroom will likely be stuffed with a whole lot of such arguments. We have our limits. We usually are not contemplating the intervention utility by any one that isn’t the complainant.’
Javed Akhtar Defamation Case: Court points warrant in opposition to Kangana
Last month, Kangana Ranaut had additionally filed an interim petition requesting that the Regional Passport Authority be directed to renew her passport, which is critical for her to journey to Budapest, Hungary for a movie shoot. During the listening to on this petition on June 28, Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, showing for the Passport Authority, informed the courtroom that Kangana Ranaut’s petition is unclear and it isn’t clear what legal proceedings are pending in opposition to her.
Kangana Ranaut’s counsel Rizwan Siddiqui informed the bench of Judge SS Shinde that solely two FIRs had been registered in opposition to the actress however legal proceedings haven’t began in opposition to the actress in these FIRs. The lawyer stated that the primary FIR was registered by the Bandra police in October final 12 months for selling spiritual enmity by his tweets. The second FIR was registered in March this 12 months on the premise of a criticism by the writer of the guide ‘Didda: Warrior Queen of Kashmir’ who alleged that Kangana Ranaut had introduced the movie as regards to the guide with out his permission.
Kangana Ranaut livid at Maharashtra authorities for not renewing passport